ANALYSIS GENDER LANGUAGE DIFFERENCES FOUNDED IN MARSHANDA AND SIENNA KASYAFANI BY DANIEL MANANTA NETWORK PODCAST

Authors

  • Aulia Febriani Universitas Muhammadiyah Tangerang Author
  • Dalpah Dalpah University of Muhammadiyah Tangerang Author
  • Sekar Wulan Sari University of Muhammadiyah Tangerang Author
  • Nargis Nargis University of Muhammadiyah Tangerang Author

Keywords:

Gender language, Communication style, Podcast

Abstract

This research analyzes gender-based language differences in Daniel Mananta Network's podcast episode “Blak-Blakan! Ngobrol Bareng Marshanda & Sienna Kasyafani #Part5.” This study aims to identify language features that reflect gender differences, such as politeness, emotional expression, and communication style. Using a descriptive qualitative approach, data was collected through observation and transcription of conversations. The results of the analysis show that women more often use polite language, soft intonation, intensifiers, and emotional expressions, while men are more assertive, direct, and simple. Social factors such as cultural norms and gender roles influence these differences.  This study found that interactions in podcasts reflect social dynamics that demonstrate gender roles in informal communication. This research provides important insights into gender variation in language use in Indonesia, particularly in the context of digital media..

References

T. Dashela and Y. Mustika, “Gender Differences in English Language Learning,” J. Ilm. Spectr., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 092–105, 2022, doi: 10.47255/f8aa1v48.

I. Zeler, C. Fuentes-Lara, and Á. Moreno, “Female leadership in communication management in Spain: making a difference in a sexist culture,” Corp. Commun., vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 74–92, 2022, doi: 10.1108/CCIJ-04-2022-0047.

I. melina Kristy, “Differences in Language Conversation Use by Gender,” J. Penelit. dan Pengemb. Sains dan Hum., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 248–253, 2022, doi: 10.23887/jppsh.v6i2.43639.

N. Dhillon and G. Kaur, “Self-Assessment of Teachers’ Communication Style and Its Impact on Their Communication Effectiveness: A Study of Indian Higher Educational Institutions,” SAGE Open, vol. 11, no. 2, 2021, doi: 10.1177/21582440211023173.

Q. Pan, “On the features of female language in English,” Theory Pract. Lang. Stud., vol. 1, no. 8, pp. 1015–1018, 2011, doi: 10.4304/tpls.1.8.1015-1018.

F. Kurniawati, “Expression of Language and Gender in the Movie ‘Imperfect: Karier, Cinta & Timbangan’ (Sociolinguistic Studies),” OKARA J. Bhs. dan Sastra, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 185–200, 2021, doi: 10.19105/ojbs.v15i2.4508.

H. Rizka, “Bahasa dan Gender dalam Film Kartun Go Diego Go dan Dora the Explorer: Sebuah Kajian Sosiolinguistik,” BUANA Gend. J. Stud. Gend. dan Anak, vol. 2, no. 2, 2018, doi: 10.22515/bg.v2i2.1013.

K. McCusker and S. Gunaydin, “Research using qualitative, quantitative or mixed methods and choice based on the research,” Perfus. (United Kingdom), vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 537–542, 2014, doi: 10.1177/0267659114559116.

J. K. Magilvy and E. Thomas, “A first qualitative project: Qualitative descriptive design for novice Researchers: Scientific inquiry,” J. Spec. Pediatr. Nurs., vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 298–300, 2009, doi: 10.1111/j.1744-6155.2009.00212.x.

M. A. Harahap and S. Adeni, “Bahasa Dalam Komunikasi Gender,” J. Prof. FIS UNIVED, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 7–13, 2021.

N. A. Z. Siregar, “Analisis Penggunaan Gaya Bahasa dalam Menyoroti Perspektif Feminisme dalam Novel Hati Suhita,” J. Bhs. dan Sastra, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 134–142, 2024, doi: 10.60155/jbs.v11i2.428.

Downloads

Published

2025-01-15

How to Cite

ANALYSIS GENDER LANGUAGE DIFFERENCES FOUNDED IN MARSHANDA AND SIENNA KASYAFANI BY DANIEL MANANTA NETWORK PODCAST. (2025). VARIABLE RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2(01), 92-98. https://variablejournal.my.id/index.php/VRJ/article/view/147

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

1-10 of 32

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.